 |
|
<<O>> Difference Topic
Testing
(24 - 27 Nov 2008 - Main.martinig)
|
| |
| META TOPICPARENT | name="WebHome" |
|---|
| | | Open Source Testing has a lot of resources for testing. Opensourcetesting.org aims to boost the profile of open source testing tools within the testing industry, principally by giving users easy access from one central location to the wide range of open source testing tools available. These tools are free as in speech, not free as in beer. While you will not need to pay a vendor to use the tools, they still have a cost of ownership through evaluation, implementation, training and maintenance costs, the same as any software does. But with a handful of commercial vendors dominating the proprietary software testing tools market, make no mistake about it � these tools can make a real difference to your life as a testing professional! | |
>
> | SQA Planet is a aggregator for RSS feeds concerning software testing (unit testing, functional testing, regression testing, load testing), code review and inspection, bug and defect tracking, continuous integration. | | |
The book Handbook of Walkthroughs, Inspections and Technical Reviews has a copyright of 1990 and says in part | | | In the Winter 2005 issue of Methods & Tools, Hans Schaefer wrote an article "Risk Based Testing, Strategies for Prioritizing Tests against Deadlines"
In the Summer 2007 issue of Methods & Tools, Lisa Crispin wrote an article "An Agile Tool Selection Strategy for Web Testing Tools"
In the Winter 2007 issue of Methods & Tools, Jonathan Kohl wrote an article "Exploratory Testing: Finding the Music of Software Investigation"
| |
>
> | In the Summer 2008 issue of Methods & Tools, you find the article Acceptance TDD Explained
In the Fall 2008 issue of Methods & Tools, you find the article Outsourced Testing – Friend or Foe?
| | | Open source testing tools target varied tasks; By Mayank Sharma on April 18, 2008 (4:00:00 PM) is an overview of several open source tools including some listed above. |
|
<<O>> Difference Topic
Testing
(23 - 18 Apr 2008 - Main.robogeek)
|
|
<<O>> Difference Topic
Testing
(22 - 09 Apr 2008 - Main.robogeek)
|
| |
| META TOPICPARENT | name="WebHome" |
|---|
| | | | |
<
< |
- TestingSoftwareCorrectness?
| >
> | | | | | |
<
< | | >
> |
- CodeAnalysisApps Tools that analyze code quality or correctness by inspecting the code
| | | |
|
<<O>> Difference Topic
Testing
(21 - 29 Jan 2008 - Main.martinig)
|
| |
| META TOPICPARENT | name="WebHome" |
|---|
| | | In the Winter 2005 issue of Methods & Tools, Lloyd Roden wrote an article "Choosing and Managing the Ideal Test Team"
In the Winter 2005 issue of Methods & Tools, Hans Schaefer wrote an article "Risk Based Testing, Strategies for Prioritizing Tests against Deadlines"
In the Summer 2007 issue of Methods & Tools, Lisa Crispin wrote an article "An Agile Tool Selection Strategy for Web Testing Tools"
| |
>
> | In the Winter 2007 issue of Methods & Tools, Jonathan Kohl wrote an article "Exploratory Testing: Finding the Music of Software Investigation"
| | |
|
|
<<O>> Difference Topic
Testing
(20 - 20 Sep 2007 - Main.robogeek)
|
| |
| META TOPICPARENT | name="WebHome" |
|---|
| | | | |
>
> | | | | Also of interest might be SoftwareComplexityMeasurement, as it seems that complex software is going to be buggier. |
|
<<O>> Difference Topic
Testing
(19 - 05 Sep 2007 - Main.robogeek)
|
| |
| META TOPICPARENT | name="WebHome" |
|---|
| | | | |
>
> | | | | Also of interest might be SoftwareComplexityMeasurement, as it seems that complex software is going to be buggier. |
|
<<O>> Difference Topic
Testing
(18 - 23 Aug 2007 - Main.robogeek)
|
| |
| META TOPICPARENT | name="WebHome" |
|---|
| | | | |
<
< | Also of interest might be SoftwareComplexityMeasurement?, as it seems that complex software is going to be buggier. | >
> | Also of interest might be SoftwareComplexityMeasurement, as it seems that complex software is going to be buggier. | | | Open Source Testing has a lot of resources for testing. Opensourcetesting.org aims to boost the profile of open source testing tools within the testing industry, principally by giving users easy access from one central location to the wide range of open source testing tools available. These tools are free as in speech, not free as in beer. While you will not need to pay a vendor to use the tools, they still have a cost of ownership through evaluation, implementation, training and maintenance costs, the same as any software does. But with a handful of commercial vendors dominating the proprietary software testing tools market, make no mistake about it � these tools can make a real difference to your life as a testing professional! |
|
<<O>> Difference Topic
Testing
(17 - 23 Aug 2007 - Main.robogeek)
|
| |
| META TOPICPARENT | name="WebHome" |
|---|
| | | | |
>
> | | | | Also of interest might be SoftwareComplexityMeasurement?, as it seems that complex software is going to be buggier. | |
<
< | Open Source Testing has a lot of resources for testing. Opensourcetesting.org aims to boost the profile of open source testing tools within the testing industry, principally by giving users easy access from one central location to the wide range of open source testing tools available. These tools are free as in speech, not free as in beer. While you will not need to pay a vendor to use the tools, they still have a cost of ownership through evaluation, implementation, training and maintenance costs, the same as any software does. But with a handful of commercial vendors dominating the proprietary software testing tools market, make no mistake about it – these tools can make a real difference to your life as a testing professional! | >
> | Open Source Testing has a lot of resources for testing. Opensourcetesting.org aims to boost the profile of open source testing tools within the testing industry, principally by giving users easy access from one central location to the wide range of open source testing tools available. These tools are free as in speech, not free as in beer. While you will not need to pay a vendor to use the tools, they still have a cost of ownership through evaluation, implementation, training and maintenance costs, the same as any software does. But with a handful of commercial vendors dominating the proprietary software testing tools market, make no mistake about it � these tools can make a real difference to your life as a testing professional! | | |
|
|
<<O>> Difference Topic
Testing
(16 - 10 Jul 2007 - Main.martinig)
|
| |
| META TOPICPARENT | name="WebHome" |
|---|
| | | In the Summer 2005 issue of Methods & Tools, Lisa Crispin wrote an article "Using Customer Tests to Drive Development"
In the Winter 2005 issue of Methods & Tools, Lloyd Roden wrote an article "Choosing and Managing the Ideal Test Team"
In the Winter 2005 issue of Methods & Tools, Hans Schaefer wrote an article "Risk Based Testing, Strategies for Prioritizing Tests against Deadlines"
| |
<
< | | >
> | In the Summer 2007 issue of Methods & Tools, Lisa Crispin wrote an article "An Agile Tool Selection Strategy for Web Testing Tools"
| | |
|
|
<<O>> Difference Topic
Testing
(15 - 25 Apr 2007 - Main.robogeek)
|
| |
| META TOPICPARENT | name="WebHome" |
|---|
| | | Also of interest might be SoftwareComplexityMeasurement?, as it seems that complex software is going to be buggier. | |
<
< | Open Source Testing has a lot of resources for testing. | >
> | Open Source Testing has a lot of resources for testing. Opensourcetesting.org aims to boost the profile of open source testing tools within the testing industry, principally by giving users easy access from one central location to the wide range of open source testing tools available. These tools are free as in speech, not free as in beer. While you will not need to pay a vendor to use the tools, they still have a cost of ownership through evaluation, implementation, training and maintenance costs, the same as any software does. But with a handful of commercial vendors dominating the proprietary software testing tools market, make no mistake about it – these tools can make a real difference to your life as a testing professional! | | |
|
|
<<O>> Difference Topic
Testing
(14 - 25 Apr 2007 - Main.robogeek)
|
| |
| META TOPICPARENT | name="WebHome" |
|---|
| | | Also of interest might be SoftwareComplexityMeasurement?, as it seems that complex software is going to be buggier. | |
>
> | Open Source Testing has a lot of resources for testing. | | |
The book Handbook of Walkthroughs, Inspections and Technical Reviews has a copyright of 1990 and says in part |
|
<<O>> Difference Topic
Testing
(13 - 20 Apr 2007 - Main.robogeek)
|
| |
| META TOPICPARENT | name="WebHome" |
|---|
| | | | |
>
> | | | | Also of interest might be SoftwareComplexityMeasurement?, as it seems that complex software is going to be buggier. |
|
<<O>> Difference Topic
Testing
(12 - 18 Apr 2007 - Main.robogeek)
|
| |
| META TOPICPARENT | name="WebHome" |
|---|
| | | | |
>
> | | | | |
|
<<O>> Difference Topic
Testing
(11 - 07 Mar 2007 - Main.robogeek)
|
| |
| META TOPICPARENT | name="WebHome" |
|---|
| | | | |
>
> | | | | Also of interest might be SoftwareComplexityMeasurement?, as it seems that complex software is going to be buggier. |
|
<<O>> Difference Topic
Testing
(10 - 18 Jan 2006 - Main.martinig)
|
| |
| META TOPICPARENT | name="WebHome" |
|---|
| | | In the Summer 2003 issue of Methods & Tools, Lisa Crispin wrote an article "XP Testing Without XP: Taking Advantage of Agile Testing Practices"
In the Spring 2005 issue of Methods & Tools, Craig Murphy wrote an article "Improving Application Quality Using Test-Driven Development"
In the Summer 2005 issue of Methods & Tools, Lisa Crispin wrote an article "Using Customer Tests to Drive Development"
| |
>
> | In the Winter 2005 issue of Methods & Tools, Lloyd Roden wrote an article "Choosing and Managing the Ideal Test Team"
In the Winter 2005 issue of Methods & Tools, Hans Schaefer wrote an article "Risk Based Testing, Strategies for Prioritizing Tests against Deadlines"
| | |
|
|
<<O>> Difference Topic
Testing
(9 - 30 Nov 2005 - Main.robogeek)
|
| |
| META TOPICPARENT | name="WebHome" |
|---|
| | | | |
>
> | | | | Also of interest might be SoftwareComplexityMeasurement?, as it seems that complex software is going to be buggier. |
|
<<O>> Difference Topic
Testing
(8 - 12 Oct 2005 - Main.martinig)
|
| |
| META TOPICPARENT | name="WebHome" |
|---|
| | |
Articles on Testing:
| |
<
< | In the Summer 2003 issue of Methods & Tools, Lisa Crispin wrote an article "XP Testing Without XP: Taking Advantage of Agile Testing Practices" | >
> | In the Summer 2003 issue of Methods & Tools, Lisa Crispin wrote an article "XP Testing Without XP: Taking Advantage of Agile Testing Practices"
In the Spring 2005 issue of Methods & Tools, Craig Murphy wrote an article "Improving Application Quality Using Test-Driven Development"
In the Summer 2005 issue of Methods & Tools, Lisa Crispin wrote an article "Using Customer Tests to Drive Development"
| | |
|
|
<<O>> Difference Topic
Testing
(7 - 06 May 2004 - Main.robogeek)
|
| |
| META TOPICPARENT | name="WebHome" |
|---|
| | | Testing done correctly is one of the first steps started in a project. Long before the current rage about test first and often, I worked at a place where the Quality Assurance people were involved in software projects right from the start. The developers were not absolved of a testing their code even though we had 12 QA people for 8 developers. | |
>
> | Testing tools and methodologies fall into several areas depending on the type of application being tested:
Also of interest might be SoftwareComplexityMeasurement?, as it seems that complex software is going to be buggier. | | |
The book Handbook of Walkthroughs, Inspections and Technical Reviews has a copyright of 1990 and says in part |
|
<<O>> Difference Topic
Testing
(6 - 08 Jan 2004 - Main.bteichmann)
|
| |
| META TOPICPARENT | name="WebHome" |
|---|
Testing | |
<
< | see also JUnit | >
> | see also JUnit , jmeter | | | Testing done correctly is one of the first steps started in a project. Long before the current rage about test first and often, I worked at a place where the Quality Assurance people were involved in software projects right from the start. The developers were not absolved of a testing their code even though we had 12 QA people for 8 developers. |
|
<<O>> Difference Topic
Testing
(5 - 27 Aug 2003 - Main.redwolf)
|
| |
| META TOPICPARENT | name="WebHome" |
|---|
| | |
Discussion about Testing | |
>
> | I think the opening paragraph needs to be rewritten to be more of a definition rather than someone's personal experience. Personal experiences should be put into the discussion section. -- Main.redwolf - 27 Aug 2003 |
|
<<O>> Difference Topic
Testing
(4 - 01 Jul 2003 - Main.martinig)
|
| |
| META TOPICPARENT | name="WebHome" |
|---|
| | | -- jp - 10 June 2003
| |
>
> | Articles on Testing:
In the Summer 2003 issue of Methods & Tools, Lisa Crispin wrote an article "XP Testing Without XP: Taking Advantage of Agile Testing Practices" | | |
|
|
<<O>> Difference Topic
Testing
(3 - 13 Jun 2003 - Main.weissnix)
|
| |
| META TOPICPARENT | name="WebHome" |
|---|
| | |
| |
<
< | The the book Handbook of Walkthroughs, Inspections and Technical Reviews has a copyright of 1990 and says in part | >
> | The book Handbook of Walkthroughs, Inspections and Technical Reviews has a copyright of 1990 and says in part | | | "Our own preference is to have the test plans developed and reviewed before coding takes place..."
The book gives some reasons for this outlook. |
|
<<O>> Difference Topic
Testing
(2 - 13 Jun 2003 - Main.srnm)
|
| |
| META TOPICPARENT | name="WebHome" |
|---|
| | |
- Test planning requires a calm atmosphere,
- Test planning after coding creates a tendency for the tests to track the code,
- Implementing the tests may require a long lead time, and
| |
<
< |
- Creating the test plan usuually has a great impact on design thinking.
| >
> |
- Creating the test plan usually has a great impact on design thinking.
| | | -- jp - 10 June 2003 |
|
<<O>> Difference Topic
Testing
(1 - 10 Jun 2003 - Main.jpfersich)
|
|
>
> |
| META TOPICPARENT | name="WebHome" |
|---|
Testing
see also JUnit
Testing done correctly is one of the first steps started in a project. Long before the current rage about test first and often, I worked at a place where the Quality Assurance people were involved in software projects right from the start. The developers were not absolved of a testing their code even though we had 12 QA people for 8 developers.
The the book Handbook of Walkthroughs, Inspections and Technical Reviews has a copyright of 1990 and says in part
"Our own preference is to have the test plans developed and reviewed before coding takes place..."
The book gives some reasons for this outlook.
- Test planning requires a calm atmosphere,
- Test planning after coding creates a tendency for the tests to track the code,
- Implementing the tests may require a long lead time, and
- Creating the test plan usuually has a great impact on design thinking.
-- jp - 10 June 2003
Discussion about Testing |
|